#Sage ligne 100 v 15 serial killers crack

This case could have major policy implications for the treatment of drug using mothers and for the interpretation of child abuse charges. Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of a South Carolina woman convicted of murder homicide by child abuse after her stillborn baby was found with cocaine in its system. Legal and ethical issues will also be considered. The review will address policies on several levels including federal, state, and local public policies. One of the goals of this review is to see how what we learned from the cocaine controversy can be applied to issues arising from abuse of other (legal and illegal) drugs.

#Sage ligne 100 v 15 serial killers crack

Rising cocaine use and the emergence of crack cocaine use in the 1980s created a public outcry and redress and served to shine the spotlight on this issue. Maternal Alcohol, Tobacco and Illegal Drugs (MATID) will be used to describe maternal use of these substances during pregnancy that threatens the well being of the child. This review will encompass the three main types of addictive substances used during pregnancy: alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs (ATID). However, AOD is not specific to mothers and includes both prenatal and postnatal use as well as use by men. The acronym AOD is often used to describe the generic problem of alcohol and other drugs. Maternal prenatal substance abuse is defined as chronic use of alcohol and/or other drugs. These complexities are even more defined in cases of substance abuse by pregnant women, an issue that has been pushed to the forefront of the public consciousness over the course of the past 20 years. The complexities surrounding addiction are not easily overcome. The issue of substance abuse is one that has perpetually plagued society. For new policies we will also consider how they fit with existing policies or laws, the social impact, ethical issues and the feasibility of implementation and administration. We will address issues of efficacy (which policies work?), economics (how much does it cost?) and politics (who is it for or against?). As a review, this is a systematic analysis of existing data (findings) on maternal drug use during pregnancy for determining the best policy among the alternatives for dealing with drug using mothers and their children. The purpose of this review is to summarize policy research findings in the area of maternal prenatal substance abuse to (1) inform and advance this field, (2) identify future research needs, (3) inform policy making and (4) identify implications for policy. It is hoped that by focusing on these fundamental issues and ultimately detailing statistics, policymakers throughout the United States will consider the course of action that views both pregnant mother and fetus/child as humanely as possible. Several general policy recommendations are offered here addressing the critical issues. Just as there is lack of consensus among those who favor punishment, the same lack of consensus characterizes those states espousing treatment.

This diversity of dramatically different responses illustrates the failure to establish a uniform policy for the management of this phenomenon. Should the pregnant mother who engages in substance abuse be viewed as a criminal or as someone suffering from an illness requiring appropriate treatment? As it happens, there is a noticeably wide range of responses to this matter in the various states of the United States, ranging from a strictly criminal perspective to one that does emphasize the importance of the mother's treatment. The phenomenon of substance abuse during pregnancy has fostered much controversy, specifically regarding treatment vs.